Certain Federal benefit payments are exempt from garnishment. However, there has been no reliable means by which a bank is able to know which funds that have been deposited into an account are Federal benefit payments. Banks are caught between the competing interests of the account holder (who expects the bank not to honor a garnishment order) and creditors (who expect the bank to honor the court's instructions). Thus, banks have no choice often except to place a hold on an account and let the debtor and creditor resolve the dispute. However, this can result in hardships for the payment recipient, who often needs the payment to live on.
ABA supports putting in place a system that preserves the customer's access to funds needed to live on while minimizing the burden on the banking industry.
ABA has worked closely with Treasury and the banking agencies on trying to address the needs of all parties. Treasury issued a final rule on May 29, 2013. While any change in garnishment procedures will result in additional burden for the industry, we supported the Treasury proposal (with several suggested changes) because it attempts to address the industry's concerns in a manner that appears workable and less burdensome than other alternatives under consideration.
August 10, 2016
April 13, 2014
April 10, 2014
July 18, 2013
February 9, 2017
April 1, 2014
Policy Library
February 23, 2021
April 21, 2020
August 10, 2016
April 13, 2014
News
We have no recent news on this topic
View All NewsA weekly information resource with ABA news, analysis and resources, specifically selected to meet risk, compliance and fraud professionals’ unique content needs. (Bank members only)
Learn about new regulatory initiatives, share common compliance concerns, and seek input from peers on compliance challenges.
Your go-to resource for bankers to engage, publish best practices and discuss a variety of compliance-related topics.