Independent Price Verification (IPV) is an increasingly important process within the valuation control framework supporting the finance and risk management functions across a wide range of financial institutions. The core IPV process requires that internal prices are verified against independent third-party sources. Significant discrepancies between the internal and independent prices above a certain threshold trigger an investigation and possible adjustments.
In order to help prevent regulatory action, industry leaders are investing substantial time and resources in what they consider the core components of the valuation control framework to help ensure a more efficient and compliant process moving forward. A robust valuation control framework and IPV process allows more efficient management of risk during times of market turbulence and ensures that financial reporting is accurate and timely.
Per regulatory guidance, internal and external audit teams are required to devote considerable resources to review the control environment, including the price verification and fair value leveling processes, especially in those institutions where fair value is a critical component of reported results.
An effective IPV framework provides efficient controls for multiple risks within financial institutions. Some examples are:
Finance controls including IPV and Fair Value Leveling requires high-volume, complex data analytics. For example, multiple price vendors or third-party holders of collateral providing data in different formats requires an institution to clean and standardize the data before it can be consumed by internal systems. Additionally, current Fair Value Leveling procedures requires sensitivity and or volume analysis in order to determine the proper classifications on the balance sheet.
Manually attempting to merge disparate data sources for standardization and analysis of price differences is inefficient, labor-intensive, and can create operational risk that can leave the institution unprepared and vulnerable to negative regulatory and/or audit findings. Compliance teams need the right tools to keep up with the flow of new data and technologies, address new and changing regulations, and respond to rapidly shifting economic conditions and crises without becoming overwhelmed.
This vigilance requires control teams to process an increasingly complex set of data, consisting of many different and dynamic variables. Simply put, Excel sheets and Pivot Tables are no longer enough.
Automating critical components of the control framework increases efficiency of the control and review processes while creating a line of defense for enhanced reporting of exceptions and overrides.
Feedback from regulatory and audit examinations has highlighted that there is a need for financial institutions to revisit their current Independent Price Verification (IPV) framework to ensure processes and procedures are both effective and compliant in the current regulatory and economic environment. As a result, this has encouraged financial institutions to invest in the core components of IPV to increase efficiencies, establish robust controls, and review current policies and procedures.