Tax Credit Unions

Now is the Time to ​Eliminate the Credit Union Tax Exemption

Tax Exemption Abuse | Quotes of Note | Policy Questions | Taxation Q&As

In a time of rising debt levels, Congress should examine the affordability of the credit union tax exemption. Instead of focusing on the financial needs of low- and moderate-income individuals—the very individuals Congress envisioned them serving—evidence shows that credit unions use their tax exemption to subsidize wealthy individuals and commercial real estate developers. The credit union special tax-exempt status is no long justified.

Taxpayers can no longer afford to continue subsidizing an industry that no longer aligns with good public policy.

Compelling Facts & Figures

  • Credit Unions are now a $1 trillion industry, competition for the same business and offering the same products as community banks. Graph!

  • There are now 208 credit unions with more than $1 billion in assets - a large increase from 1991, when only 11 credit unions were this large. Graph!

  • A 2006 U.S. Government Accountability Office study found that a bigger portion of credit union customers are upper-income compared to bank customers. Graph!

  • Of the $8.6 billion credit union industry profits reported in 2012, three-fourths of those profits were concentrated in credit unions with over $500 million in assets, representing less than 6 percent of credit unions. Graph!

  • Since 2001, credit unions have increased the deficit by not paying an estimated $20.5 billion in federal income taxes.

  • The credit union tax exemption is expected to be the 17th largest corporate tax expenditure by conservative estimates found in the Office of Management and Budget's Analytical Perspectives.

  • An individual tax payer will pay more in taxes each year than all credit unions combined. Graph!

  • Decades ago, mutual insurance companies and mutual savings banks, with ownership structures similar to credit unions, lost their tax exemptions, specifically in the 1940s and 50s and continue to operate, and thrive, while paying taxes.

  • Canada and Australia, in 1972 and 1994 respectively, repealed their credit union industries' tax exemptions.

Credit Unions Abuse Their Tax Exemption

  • NEW! Credit Unions Have Outgrown Their Mission & Exemption

  • Borrowing from U.S. Treasury

    For decades, credit unions have adamantly opposed paying one dime of federal income taxes and continue to do so. Yet, the credit union industry borrowed more than $29 billion dollars from the U.S. Treasury.

    Borrowing:
    • more than $18 billion to stabilize two failed corporate credit unions through the National Credit Union Administration's Credit Liquidity Facility in 2009 and
    • more than $11 billion by the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund to handle resolution costs of failed corporate credit unions.

    More than $5 billion of the borrowed funds remain outstanding, due to the taxpayers.

    Credit Union Public Policy Questions

    Credit unions that bear little resemblance to a traditional credit union are fast growing, aggressive institutions, offering products and services identical to those of taxpaying banks.  This new breed of tax advantaged "credit unions" raise the following important public policy questions:

    • If there is no practical difference between the new breed credit unions and other financial service providers - either in the products they provide or whom they serve - is preferential tax treatment justified?

    • If some credit unions no longer focus on moderate and lower income people, as they are mandated to do, should they retain their preferential tax treatment?

    • If not, where should the line be drawn to limit extension of the credit union tax exemption?

    • What would be the impact of eliminating credit unions' preferential tax treatment for this new breed of credit unions?

    Quotes of Note

    Credit Union Leadership

    Read the following to see what credit union CEOs are saying about taxing credit unions:

    • "The only impact taxation would have on TDECU is that we will double in size every seven years instead of every five years. So what? The NCUA special assessments prove my point. Last year and for the next nine years, credit unions are paying special NCUA assessments, assessments that have just about the same impact as a 35% tax on credit union net income.

      The assessments we paid - and will pay for the next decade - did not drive us to change loan and deposit rates and fees last year, nor will they in the future.

      Paying a 35% tax on income would have the same impact on how we price: none, nada, zip."

      Ed Speed, former CEO Texas Dow Employees Credit Union, guest opinion in Credit Union Times, 2011


    • "I have long believed that the original logic of a credit union tax exemption has expired, and that credit unions, like other business cooperatives in the United States, should pay their fair share...The tax exemption that we enjoy does not make us a credit union...I call upon the leaders of our industry to take the bold step of offering to give up our federal income tax exemption..."

      Rick Leas, President/CEO Golden Bay Federal Credit Union as reported in Credit Union Times, 2005


    • "Tax avoidance shouldn't be an industry. Taxes pay for a system of good government. American taxpayers are subsidizing credit union members."

      Rob Nicholls, CEO Australian National Credit Union, as reported by Credit Union Times, 2005

    Historical bipartisan support

    Administrations on both sides of the aisle have recommended taxing credit unions as seen in the following quotes:

    • "There is no reason to continue to distinguish credit unions from other financial institutions. The powers and services of credit unions have expanded greatly over the past several years, so that they are no longer truly mutual institutions with limited common bonds. Credit unions are most analogous to thrift institutions in the functions they perform and thus should be taxed on the same basis."

      President Carter's 1978 Tax Program, Department of the Treasury Fact Sheet


    • "Because of their tax exemption, credit unions enjoy a competitive advantage over other financial institutions such as commercial banks and savings and loan associations.  Their tax-exempt status has enabled credit unions to grow rapidly since 1951, when savings and loan associations and mutual savings banks became subject to the corporate income tax...In an economy based on free market principles, the tax system should not provide a competitive advantage for particular commercial enterprises.  Credit unions should thus be subject to tax on the same basis as other thrift institutions."

      President Reagan's Administration in Tax Proposals to Congress, 1985


    • “Because of their tax exemption, credit unions enjoy a competitive advantage over other financial institutions such as commercial banks and savings and loan associations. Credit unions have grown rapidly since 1951, when savings and loan associations and mutual savings banks became subject to the corporate income tax.

      … In an economy based on free market principles, the tax system should not provide a tax subsidy to particular commercial enterprises or a competitive advantage to those enterprises over others that perform substantially the same functions. Although credit unions were founded to extend short-term personal loans to narrowly defined groups, today large credit unions frequently function more as full-service consumer banks.”

      President George H. W. Bush's Budget Proposals, Department of the Treasury General Explanations, 1992

​Questions? Contact Keith Leggett for more information.

 

 Related Topics

 
 

 Contact Us

 
 

 Additional Resources

 
 

 Twitter