|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System
Issue
The Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System plays an important funding role for banks, particularly community banks. The continued activities of the System will be affected by changes occurring within the system and potentially affected by a variety of regulatory and legislative proposals.
Position Statement
ABA strongly supports maintenance of a cooperatively based FHLBank System with a primary mission of providing banks with access to advances for housing and community development lending. The FHLBanks should be responsive to their membership, developing products and expertise to address their members' changing needs.
Any new significant policy and regulation adopted by the Federal Housing Finance Agency should only be adopted after a formal notice and comment period. ABA supports regular review of the FHLBanks' operations to ensure that individual FHLBanks are operating in a safe and sound manner. Regulation should also include analysis of the risk factors associated with concentration, collateral, and other significant matters related to the System. Neither the Federal Housing Finance Agency nor the FHLBanks should act to diminish members' ownership rights to the Banks' retained earnings. ABA believes that it is essential that FHLBank disclosure policies promote communication of the information needed by the cooperative owners of the FHLBanks to participate fully in their governance and be consistent with the Security and Exchange Commission's Regulation FD. ABA strongly recommends improving the FHLBanks' corporate governance by substantially increasing the role of stockholders and improving the qualifications and financial acumen of all directors, including the public interest directors. ABA supports the retention of existing FHLBank investment authorities and the development of new and innovative products supported by activity-based capital, in the context of a risk-based capital structure. ABA supports developing policies based on industry-wide consensus on issues dealing with multi-district FHLBank membership and the acquired member asset (AMA) programs, as well as new programs and products that may have a System wide impact.
Any policies or regulations on these issues must:
- Be adopted only after a formal notice and comment period
- Maintain the cooperative and risk-averse nature of the System
- Preserve the regional structure of the System
- Ensure member charter choice and not advantage or disadvantage any group or sub-group of eligible members; and
- In light of the multi-district operations of many members, preserve the local nature of the Affordable Housing Program, the Community Investment Program and similar programs.
Explanation
The core function of the FHLBank System remains to provide vital liquidity to its member financial institutions in support of residential and community-based lending. The FHLBanks should continue to focus on the funding of housing lending, while accommodating the new, expanded range of collateral and deployment of advance proceeds permitted to community financial institutions as defined by statute.
The creation of the Federal Housing Finance Agency brought together the regulation of all of the housing GSEs. Shortly thereafter, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorship by this new regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. This change in status for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac only highlights the differences between the FHLBank System and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the need for regulation to recognized the unique nature of the FHLBank System. Unlike the other housing GSEs, the FHLBank System is a cooperative made up of twelve independent FHLBanks with joint and several liability. The FHLBanks, out of the proceeds from net income, operate statutorily mandated affordable housing programs and are responsible for paying off the RefCorp bonds that were used to help resolve the 1980s savings and loan deposit insurance agency losses. Each FHLBank is primarily capitalized through the purchase of stock by its member institutions. FHLBank stock is not available to the public and is not tradable even within an FHLBank without the express permission of the FHLBank.
The current corporate governance structure of the FHLBank System was established by statute. Over the years, certain governance functions have devolved from the regulator to the FHLBanks themselves. ABA members believe that the composition of the Boards of each of the FHLBanks is a critical element in ensuring that the governance of the FHLBank is undertaken in an appropriate manner. As all of the FHLBanks, and the FHLBank System in general, have evolved into sophisticated financial institutions, we believe that financial, business, and operating expertise must be demonstrated by the Board of each FHLBank. We strongly support careful consideration of changes to the statute, the regulation, and practices, which will ensure that each FHLBank has a Board that is composed of members with a stake in the System who understand the commitment and importance of serving on the FHLBank Board. As the financial structure of the Banks becomes increasingly complex, it is important to have strong financial qualifications for all directors so that they can effectively oversee the FHLBanks' operations.
The FHLBanks should have, within the risk-based capital structure, maximum flexibility in determining the most appropriate investment strategy for the FHLBanks, in order to meet the needs of their member institutions and communities. The FHLBanks should be encouraged to be responsive to member needs, developing new products and programs that enhance their members' ability to extend competitive credit products to the communities they serve. New forms of member created assets should evolve on the balance sheets and in the operations of the FHLBanks in a manner consistent with the statutory authority of the FHLBanks and objective risk/reward criteria. They should be governed by risk-based capital standards and cooperative, activity-based capital requirements.
The capital plans of the twelve FHLBanks have diverse and varying components designed best to meet the needs of their members. In such an environment the FHFA must, in addition to ensuring that each FHLBank operates in a safe and sound manner, analyze the impact of the plans on the System as a whole. Careful review and prudent oversight must be carried out to avoid destabilizing competition and arbitrage of membership and to preserve the cooperative nature of the System. Requiring the members of a cooperative to provide capital support for their individual activities is the best method of preserving the cooperative nature of the System.
The RefCorp obligation, which the FHLBanks are expected to have fulfilled ahead of schedule, should not be increased or extended when the RefCorp obligation has been fulfilled. No new program or legislation is needed. Once this obligation is met, the FHLBanks should devote these resources towards the programs and purposes that benefit the System and its members, as authorized in their charters.
ABA supports conditional multi-district membership if the FHFA determines it is authorized by statute. Any policies developed must be developed in an environment of full industry participation and discussion that preserves the cooperative nature of the System and the vital functions performed by the FHLBank System and its district Banks.
ABA supports allowing the FHLBanks to issue standby letters of credit to community banks in support of tax exempt bonds for community and economic development purposes.
Letters of Credit will provide an additional credit enhancement option as issuers work to structure cost effective financing on projects like water treatment facilities, fire stations, long-term care facilities for the elderly, medical clinics, school buses, bridges and other infrastructure improvements. This will enhance competition in the marketplace and expand access to critical funding for projects and authorities often overlooked by larger players.
Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) was temporarily expanded in 2008 to include the FHLBanks in the list of GSEs authorized to provide credit enhancement for tax-exempt bonds. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, FHA, and VA have been permitted since 1984 under the IRC to provide credit support. At the time, FHLBanks did not offer letters of credit (LOCs) for tax-exempt bonds and so were not included in the authorization. In 1989, the FHLBanks' mission was expanded by Congress to include community and economic development. The ability to offer these letters of credit explicitly meets this aspect of the Banks' mission. Tax-exempt financing allows local governments and authorities to finance important projects at a lower cost. The temporary inclusion of the FHLBanks should be made permanent.
Contact for further information: Joe Pigg (202) 663-5480.
|