ABA Leadership on Current Policy Issues
June 2009
Since the economic recession began to intensify last year, ABA has played a pivotal role in alerting policymakers to critical issues affecting banks and proposing practical solutions. We have used our stature as the largest and most representative association of the banking industry, and our reputation for fairness, professionalism and smarts, to vigorously defend the reputation of traditional banks in the media and seek improvements to countless flawed (yet sometimes inevitable) policy proposals.
With a staff of 350, including the most experienced, knowledgeable and connected policy experts in the banking industry, ABA has delved into the kind of details that we know make a huge difference in banks' daily operations – from the tax treatment of GSE preferred stock to application of other-than-temporary-impairment rules and the need to allow a bank to reflect the full amount of its allowance for loan and lease losses in its capital.
We also have leveraged the kind of grassroots support that can only come from an organization that has a strong alliance with 55 state banking associations and represents the entire industry to pass crucial deposit insurance legislation and block damaging cram-down and interchange proposals.
The pace of bill introductions and enactments, and of new regulatory programs and proposals, has been unlike anything the banking industry has seen in decades – and it will continue in the months to come.
Following is a list of some of the most pressing issues to be addressed, and what ABA is doing to advance the banking industry's interests.
Regulatory Restructuring. ABA, guided by a Regulatory Restructuring Task Force appointed last year, is advocating reforms that close gaps in regulation while preserving efficiency, competition, and innovation in banking. Specific issues include:
- Systemic risk. ABA has urged creation of a council of regulators, chaired by the Federal Reserve Board chairman, to oversee systemic risk. The council should be a stand-alone agency with a small staff specifically charged with identifying systemic issues and recommending solutions. The council should not regulate institutions itself.
- Consumer financial products regulator. ABA strongly opposes creation of a consumer financial products regulator as it is impractical both from a regulatory and political perspective and in practice counterproductive to protecting consumer interests.
- Resolution authority. ABA strongly supports creation of a mechanism for resolving systemically important, nonbank institutions and thereby addressing the lingering effects of too-big-to-fail. However, ABA opposes giving that authority to FDIC, since it could undermine public confidence in banks' deposit insurance system and result in banks footing the bill for nonbank resolutions.
- Agency consolidation. ABA opposes consolidation of the banking agencies into a single regulator. Such a move would be the end of a true dual banking system, since a federal regulatory agency would undoubtedly have a strong bias toward federally regulated institutions, and it would over time stifle innovation.
- Accounting oversight. ABA urges Congress to give the new systemic regulator authority over how accounting rules are developed and applied.
- Charter options. ABA strongly advocates the preservation of charter options and the retention of the Office of Thrift Supervision under Treasury. This includes ABA's passionate support for the mutual option. ABA also has long advocated an optional federal charter for insurance.
ABA staff experts: Wayne Abernathy, Mark Tenhundfeld, Denyette DePierro, Mary Frances Monroe, Dawn Causey, Bob Davis
Deposit Insurance.
ABA staff experts: Jim Chessen, Rob Strand
Fair Value Accounting. ABA stood apart in launching an aggressive advocacy campaign last year to raise awareness of the procyclical effects of mark-to-market accounting. The campaign – profiled in a recent front-page Wall Street Journal story – culminated in critical changes early this year to the way FASB's fair value and other-than-temporary impairment rules are applied. ABA continues to pursue additional changes, believing that FASB's emphasis on the "exit price" to determine fair value does not work in a distressed market. In addition, more work is needed by FASB to determine the validity of mark-to-market for institutions, like traditional banks, that have business models that are not based on buying and selling in the markets. ABA's advocacy, assisted by a team of tax and accounting experts, will become ever more important as pressure grows to align U.S. rules with international fair value standards.
ABA staff experts: Bob Davis, Donna Fisher, Michael Gullette
Industry Image. ABA continues to leverage our extensive nationwide media contacts to promote traditional banking and assure policymakers and the public that banks are strong and continue to lend. In September and October alone, ABA spokespeople fielded nearly 1,000 media calls on the financial crisis and offered reassuring messages that the vast majority of banks are safe and well capitalized. We also have offered bankers ads, talking points, sample speeches and columns to help them reinforce this message in their communities. ABA's Ed Yingling and Diane Casey-Landry have appeared numerous times on networks and programs like Good Morning America, CBS Evening News, CNBC, and Fox Business News to advocate on issues ranging from bank safety to mark-to-market accounting.
ABA also is working to ensure policymakers – including President Obama himself -- make the proper distinction between traditional banks and the unregulated entities – including mortgage brokers and hedge funds -- that spurred the economic crisis. In a February letter to Obama, ABA President and CEO Ed Yingling chastised the president for speeches in which he labeled all financial firms involved in the economic crisis "banks." Yingling clarified that most of the country's 8,000-plus banks never made a sub-prime loan.
ABA staff experts: Ginny Dean, Floyd Stoner, John Hall, Jim Chessen
Protecting Interchange. ABA opposes proposals to allow the government to set price controls or otherwise arbitrarily regulate interchange rates, which currently are set by the private market through contractual relationships. Several attempts to attach interchange restrictions to the credit card bill enacted in May were defeated after ABA and its grassroots bankers generated more than 20,000 customized letters in opposition. This issue is likely to remain on the front burner, as retailers have made a priority of seeing some sort of legislation pass this year.
ABA staff experts: Ken Clayton, Nessa Feddis
Executive Compensation. ABA is very concerned that the government has hastily enacted compensation restrictions that will unfairly disadvantage the healthy banks participating in Treasury's Capital Purchase Program. Furthermore, the Obama administration has signaled its intention to pursue additional executive compensation restrictions for all publicly traded companies, and bank regulators are working on new standards that will become part of the supervisory process. ABA will continue to fight such rules and exam guidelines that might have a negative impact on bank compliance and employee retention efforts.
ABA staff experts: Sally Miller, Carolyn Walsh
Mortgage Banking/Cramdowns. ABA's extensive grassroots network – which generated thousands of letters and contacts to congressional offices this spring -- helped defeat legislation that would have given bankruptcy judges the broad power to cram down the remaining balances on mortgages and modify or change the interest rate or loan terms. ABA, with the most experienced mortgage banking staff at any bank trade association, will continue to work to block such legislation. ABA also continues to urge regulators to scrap troublesome RESPA changes that are scheduled to take effect at the beginning of 2010, and we will work closely with policymakers as they determine the fate of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. ABA's goal is a strong a resilient secondary mortgage market that preserves the cooperative nature of Federal Home Loan Banks.
ABA staff experts: Bob Davis, Joe Pigg, Rod Alba
TARP/CPP and Similar Regulatory Programs. No other trade association has done more to ensure all banks, regardless of charter type or size, have access to government capital programs. ABA has also worked closely with regulatory staff to address the specific needs of banks participating in programs like the Capital Purchase Program. We aggressively pressed Treasury to release term sheets for Subchapter S banks and mutual institutions. We also recently formed a CPP Peer Group to enable ABA members to share experiences, ideas and issues related to their institutions' CPP participation.
ABA staff experts: Mark Tenhundfeld, Cathy McTighe
Exam Issues. ABA continues to solicit feedback from bankers about their latest exam experiences and to channel important issues to regulators. Discussions at a recent America's Community Bankers Council meeting revealed an increased attention to liquidity, CRE loans, internal stress testing and pandemic preparedness. Some also commented on additional scrutiny of the loan review process, loan participations and reserve levels. ABA routinely alerts regulatory leaders in Washington to situations in which an examiner appears to be out of sync with headquarters. Exam trends will also be analyzed by a new ABA task force (see below).
ABA staff experts: Mark Tenhundfeld, Denyette DePierro
Community Bank Solutions Task Force. ABA is concerned that the wide range of government programs initiated since last fall has not done enough to help community banks manage the fallout of the economic crisis. We have heard from bankers that more needs to be done to ensure community banks have access to capital-raising alternatives and that unduly harsh examinations are having unintended consequences. To address this, ABA has assembled a task force of bankers from areas hit hardest by the recession. The task force is exploring regulatory solutions to community bank-specific challenges and plans to meet frequently with regulators in Washington.
ABA staff experts: Diane Casey-Landry, Wayne Abernathy, Mark Tenhundfeld, Christy Walika
Credit Unions. ABA has long been the leader in containing the growth of large, aggressive credit unions. Through a long-term, multi-pronged strategy, ABA is checking credit union expansion in the courts, at the regulatory level and in Congress. The most recent threat has come in the form of a potential bill, spearheaded by New York Sen. Charles Schumer, that would eliminate the cap on credit unions' business lending. ABA has held back passage of similar legislation for several years, and we are actively working to discourage introduction and co-sponsorship of this bill.
ABA staff experts: Keith Leggett, Carter McDowell
Overdraft Protection. Overdraft protection is an important and valued service for bank customers and a significant revenue source that is under attack. ABA has taken the lead in opposing legislation (H.R. 1456) that would seriously limit banks' ability to accommodate customers who overdraw their accounts. By requiring banks to decline checks other payments, the legislation would diminish consumer choice and convenience. ABA has also worked closely with the Federal Reserve to improve the workability of its proposed regulations in this area. ABA believes the Fed's proposal should be given a chance to work before additional legislation is considered.
ABA Staff Experts: Rich Riese, Nessa Feddis

